I started to look around for empirical research on this topic. There was one thing that was diminishing this synergy effect. It was the fact that our product owner was not co-located with us. On the other hand, I am often surprised by how little attention is paid to these same policies and controls once you are inside a physical office.

Why are things easier for co-located teams

I sense a growing reluctance amongst the best developers to accept the location and commuting disadvantages of single-site work. This is increasingly true as people get more experienced, and thus more valuable. You can either try to ignore this and accept the best people who will relocate for you, or you can explore how to make remote working patterns more effective. I think that organizations that are able to make remote working patterns effective will have a significant and growing competitive advantage. Co-location also introduces a huge amount of out-of-band conversations which improves personal relationships.


Outsourced agile distributed teams challenges your involvement in the process, however, they deliver a proven quality. By 2015, job-posting platforms reported an increase of 36% from companies looking for distributed agile teams to fulfill their positions. This number is predicted to grow by up to 50% in the nearest future. InVision, GitLab, HippoEducation – are examples of organizations that considered remote teams as an excellent decision for performing their remote software development in Agile.

Why are things easier for co-located teams

This suggests that team members are aware that it’s difficult to coordinate when they are located in different organizations or when they have to coordinate across geographic boundaries. Vitality Chicago provides the Agile Training, Scrum Certification, and Agile Coaching that organizations need to increase business agility. Our Agile Training courses help teams boost productivity, https://www.globalcloudteam.com/ optimize their development process, and deliver better customer solutions. Our Trainers and Coaches have the deep expertise to help you at all points of your agile transformation journey. Co-located teams can’t take advantage of lower people costs like distributed teams. Nor can they accommodate those with virtual offices, or individuals working from home.

Distributed Teams vs. Co-Located Teams

They’re free, easy-­‐to-­‐use, and everywhere -­‐-­‐ an easy way to boost your productivity. One of the nice features of LucidChart and many of the other tools is that you can work from an URL. That is, if you can click a link on a browser somewhere, you can get to the doc and start participating. That’s a tremendous improvement over past build team culture toolsets where it might be hours or days of configuration and training from wanting to try a tool to being productive with one. In addition, web apps are designed for mass appeal and easy adoption, further reducing the barrier to collaboration. Many teams that begin using Agile techniques toss out diagramming, and that’s a big loss.

Why are things easier for co-located teams

His point is that physical proximity may help, but it is mental proximity that is even more important. You could have physical proximity without mental proximity, and mental proximity without physical proximity. Over the past year, we have all become used to working in dispersed teams. But now that it’s becoming possible to go back to the office and work side-by-side with colleagues, it’s natural to ask how much we actually will.

The Most Crucial Thing About Scrum

His generation was not born into a world in clouds and containers technology, Slack, GitHub and a myriad of other tools and platforms that can be accessed from anywhere. Also, his argument is based on his (well-informed) opinion more than any data or metrics. I would argue that the ubiquity of location itself makes this very challenging to study or track. VPNs allow us to securely access network resources while hiding our location with a new IP address. Now that you understand the pros and cons of co location versus distributed team management, when should you prefer either of the engagement models for software development? Co-location is ideal if you want to take an agile approach because bringing the team together under one building fosters creativity and “think together” sessions.

The prerequisites for this kind of cooperation are effective, open communication and appropriate space and time. Gathering a group of people with the right skills in a room and calling it a “team space” doesn’t necessarily make them a team. The result of a good team is not just the sum of all the skills—it is much more. They also use their individual superpowers to help the whole team grow and make the magic happen.

Product Designers, Focus on Copy Early

I no longer need to visit most shops, libraries, or travel agents. For successful adoption of scrum methodology there should be high bandwidth communication among the team members. In Scrum Methodology, the core team is supposed to work together to help each other out at every stage of development. Even it also involves maintaining an interface with the stakeholders to make sure that the product is developed exactly to the client need. It helps in better creation and validation of the project deliverables.

Why are things easier for co-located teams

It becomes easy for team members to have trust in each other. But sometimes making the whole team and resources work in one place can be expensive. There will be some extra expenditure on the software and need hardware requirements. It leads to increased trust and mutual respect among the team members and a person feel more comfortable working with a person whom you know, which is possible only if they are located at the same place. Data centers have fully redundant network connections to ensure that your business-critical applications always run uninterrupted.

Target Custom Audiences and exclude bad traffic in Google Ads

In this regard, the co-located team model is considered to be extremely time-effective, as it enables programmers to rapidly address possible errors which leads to faster project fulfillment. You can assemble programmers at any given time to discuss current matters or check team performance. Moreover, you don’t need any intermediaries to help you manage the team, as your communication with the developers is carried out directly and openly. Co-location can be efficient when launching a startup, where every project must be managed closely internally. However, the model can only be more efficient when prudently managed for agility to flourish.

To their surprise, they gained a large number of new members. They discovered that unintentionally, for many years, they excluded a big group of people who are housebound as a carer and were therefore excluded. The choir decided that in the future they will run choir practices in a physical location as well as remotely. Remote working is a common issue that comes up in web articles and blogs and I haven’t attempted to pull together a suggested reading list.


I will, however, suggest an article I wrote a decade ago about using agile methods for offshore work, based on our experiences in India. The advice and conclusions in the article are still valid for multi-site teams, although there are a couple of technological tweaks I keep intending to add. While I’ve been involved in discussions about remote working many times in my years in the industry, I don’t feel there is much of a conclusive set of factors I can talk about. The evidence of effects of remote working on software development resist being gathered together in any meaningful way. Yet when it comes to developing software, many developers do not take advantage of the communication possibilities of connected computers. Yahoo got a lot of press when it recently brought all its off-site workers back to a single site.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *